Zionazi
2024-12-22 16:49:05 UTC
Reply
Permalinkwent to the coastal cities, and one woman came before me who circumcised
her first son and he died, and she circumcised her second son and he
died, and since she feared circumcising the third due to concern that he
might die as well, she brought him before me. I saw that he was red. I
said to her: Wait until his blood is absorbed into him. She waited until
his blood was absorbed into him and then circumcised him, and he lived.
And they would call him Natan the Babylonian after my name.“
Shabbat 134A
https://www.cirp.org/library/cultural/neusner1/
This is one Crazy ass Rabbi lol… he does not want to learn…
Adding to that the more recent study I talked about in the other Thread
in which 2 Jewish infants died because of complications resulting from
Metzitzah B‘peh, I Wonder how many Jewish Children have been indirectly
but in Parts Willingly - as one didn’t learn from the previous deaths -
sacrificed over the Course of history for hashem? And when I mention
this, many Jews turn into complete idiots.
Exemption for the fourth Child:
„ As it is taught in a baraita: If a woman circumcised her first son and
he died as a result of the circumcision, and she circumcised her second
son and he also died, she should not circumcise her third son, as the
deaths of the first two produce a presumption that this woman’s sons die
as a result of circumcision. This is the statement of Rabbi Yehuda
HaNasi. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says: She should circumcise her third
son, as there is not considered to be a legal presumption that her sons
die from circumcision, but she should not circumcise her fourth son if
her first three sons died from circumcision.“
Yevamot 64b
https://www.sefaria.org/Yevamot.64b.9?lang=bi&with=all
——
This is precisely why it’s unfortunate for the Jews I don’t get to
define their religious Rituals…