Post by DeepBluePost by ZionaziSo it appears, Gould‘s Burleske
is rather not well-liked.
And for good reason. Can you spell
L-E-A-D-E-N ?!? He plays it like a
dirge, not like a "Burleske".
How would you know? Ever been to a burlesque Show? They’re usually not
as Angry as Richter or you are… No need to Break the Piano… the
vulgarity in this case maybe Should have a certain class? It’s Not the
Hammerklavier is it? It’s also a relaxed Atmosphere at burlesque shows
as far as i know… This is Not a Gang bang swinger Party…
Post by DeepBluePost by ZionaziLet me see ifI can hear this…
No you can't. You would have
heard it already if you could.
Maybe Richter stopped playing it because of Gould ;D
Post by DeepBluePost by Zionazithe Problem with Argerich imo is,
she Rushes too much,
How would you know? You don't
know the score, you don't play
the piano, and you have absolutely
no understanding of piano performance.
Because music is a Sensory experience you retard narcissist…
Post by DeepBluePost by ZionaziSimilar to freire… and they‘re
both not really mischeavous in
contrast to Gould - who is also
really raw and dark…
And what makes you think the work
is "raw and dark" ?!?
I like it raw and dark (like Mozart‘s DG) — burlesque Shows - Good ones
- are also raw (with a certain class) and dark. I also Like Sex raw
(with a certain Class) and Dark — and since were Talking Burleske (and
parody) it seems to fit the Bill.
Post by DeepBlueNot to mention "raw and dark" is
is inconsistent with mischievous
(note the spelling).
Not really.
Note that You’re being pedantic again.
Post by DeepBlueBTW did you notice how slow Gould
plays it?
Can you spell B-U-T-C-H-E-R?
Ask your mama who let others butcher your Penis ;D
Post by DeepBlueTime to remove the concrete from
your ears and flush all the shit
between them.
? Go listen to Shitomi Uehara