Discussion:
"...As new recordings of Mahler's" works were made--most in stereo and thus better able to convey the complexity of the scores--there seemed little reason to rely on older recordings..."
(too old to reply)
gggg gggg
2021-06-02 07:49:10 UTC
Permalink
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Mahler_s_Forgotten_Conductor/34zcDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22recordings+of+Mahler%27s%22&pg=PA103&printsec=frontcover
gggg gggg
2021-12-30 08:15:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by gggg gggg
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Mahler_s_Forgotten_Conductor/34zcDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22recordings+of+Mahler%27s%22&pg=PA103&printsec=frontcover
- Mahler is not that interesting to listen to anymore unless you can hear each of the individual instruments.
- https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=%22Mahler+is+not+that+interesting+to+listen+to+anymore+unless+you+can+hear+each+of+the+individual+instruments.%22
According to this:

- The 1960s rehabilitation of Mahler's music, which is often seen as a byproduct of stereo...

https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Art_of_Record_Production/1njeCwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22The+1960s+rehabilitation+of+Mahler%27s+music,+which+is+often+seen+as+a+byproduct+of+stereo%22&pg=PT266&printsec=frontcover
Loading...